🔗 Share this article

The number of reserved seats for Māori representatives on NZ councils will be slashed by over 50%, following a controversial legislative amendment that required local governments to put the fate of hard-won Indigenous wards to a popular referendum.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have one or more elected officials depending on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the option to vote for a guaranteed Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Originally, councils could only create a Māori ward by first submitting it to a public vote in their area. Local populations often spent years generating community backing and pushing their local governments to create Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the former administration allowed municipal authorities to establish a Māori ward without initially mandating them to subject it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, saying communities should decide whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change mandated local authorities that had created a ward under the previous policy to hold binding referendums concurrently with the local body elections, which concluded on October 11. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the public vote, 17 decided to keep their seats, and 25 to disestablish theirs – showing numerous areas against guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes provided “a crucial move in restoring local democratic control.”

Opposition parties however have condemned the new policy as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the coalition government has implemented sweeping rollbacks to measures intended to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has said it aims to end “race-based” approaches, and asserts it is committed to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the public votes were divided down city-country divisions – most cities required to vote backed Māori wards, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

This year’s municipal polls recorded the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with under one-third of citizens participating, prompting calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are permitted to create different wards – including rural wards – without initially mandating a public vote. The different conditions placed on Māori wards suggested the government was targeting Māori representation.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark referred to the 17 areas that voted to keep their wards.